Case Studies

Results across complex operations.

Each example follows the same thread: the challenge, how we approached it, what was implemented, the result and what held afterwards. Client names are withheld. Figures are as measured at the time; where a result wasn't quantified, it's described without a number.

Pharmaceuticals · Regulated manufacturing

A filling line that stopped every 23 minutes

  • 58% → 77%OEE
  • 23 min → 3.2 hrsbetween stoppages
  • +32,000units per day
  • 10 weekstimeframe
  1. Challenge

    A pharmaceutical filling line was stopping every 23 minutes and running at 58% OEE. Downtime had come to be accepted as normal. No downtime data was captured and there was no structured problem solving.

  2. Approach

    Start with the people running the line: make the stoppages visible, agree which three issues cost the most, and work on those first.

  3. Implementation

    Frontline Kaizen with an internal CI lead: visual downtime tracking, structured root-cause problem solving on the top three issues, and standard work for the fixes.

  4. Results

    Time between stoppages rose from 23 minutes to 3.2 hours and OEE from 58% to 77%, adding about 32,000 units per day within 10 weeks. The line completed four separate 12-hour runs with no stoppage.

  5. Sustained impact

    The routines were built into the site's operating system: process verification, leader standard work, gemba walks and tiered daily management.

Defence manufacturing · Capacity strategy

Capacity facts before a major capital decision

  • 5growth scenarios modelled
  • ~50%less inspection time
  1. Challenge

    A regulated defence manufacturer was considering significant capital investment and a site change, without a clear picture of its current constraints, bottleneck equipment or achievable volumes at each growth step.

  2. Approach

    Model production capacity across five growth scenarios, with constraint analysis by work centre, so the decision rested on what the operation could actually produce.

  3. Implementation

    The analysis identified metrology as a bottleneck. The metrology process was redesigned to release capacity already in the operation.

  4. Results

    About 50% of inspection time saved. The board received a capacity roadmap across all five scenarios and made its capital decision with that evidence.

Mining equipment manufacturing · Multi-site

From reactive maintenance to planned work

  • 28% → 74%planned maintenance ratio
  • 4 yearsmulti-site engagement
  1. Challenge

    Maintenance operated almost entirely in reactive mode. There was no structured improvement capability, and performance varied widely between sites.

  2. Approach

    Build improvement capability at every leadership level rather than run improvement for the business.

  3. Implementation

    Structured CI coaching for team leaders, supervisors and managers. Maintenance scheduling was redesigned, with planned maintenance ratio targets tracked through visual management.

  4. Results

    Planned maintenance ratio increased from 28% to 74%, with productivity gains documented across multiple Kaizen events.

  5. Sustained impact

    A four-year partnership across multiple sites, with improvement capability developed in the client's own leaders at each level.

Electronics manufacturing · Assembly

Assembly lead time cut by more than half

  • 14 → 6.2 wkslead time
  • −56%within 12 weeks
  1. Challenge

    Assembly lead times of more than 14 weeks were frustrating customers and limiting the business's ability to respond to demand.

  2. Approach

    Map the value stream to find where time was going. The causes were fragmented scheduling, excess work in progress and unbalanced workstations.

  3. Implementation

    Workstation rebalancing, pull scheduling and targeted sprints to reduce work in progress across the assembly floor.

  4. Results

    Lead time fell from 14 weeks to 6.2 weeks, a 56% reduction, within 12 weeks of the engagement starting.

Energy & mining · Safety culture

Safety ownership across a 900-person site

  • 900+people engaged directly
  1. Challenge

    A 900-person energy and mining site had a safety culture driven by compliance. Safety was something done to teams rather than by them.

  2. Approach

    Work with site leadership to co-design how the program would be governed, then deliver it with them rather than for them.

  3. Implementation

    Co-designed governance with site leaders, co-delivered safety Kaizen boards at team level, and built frontline capability to lead their own safety conversations.

  4. Results

    More than 900 people engaged directly, and a shift from compliance toward teams owning their safety conversations.

  5. Sustained impact

    The site leadership team was equipped to run the program independently.

Further documented results

Other results from my career.

+70% output

On one product line in four weeks, through end-to-end process redesign and implementation coaching.

Electronics and smart metering manufacturing
DIFOT 25% → 85%

Job sequencing and FIFO implemented from job release to packing across the value stream.

Optical lens manufacturing, two NSW sites
$3M+ identified

Cost-saving opportunities found through an enterprise operational assessment: 50+ stakeholder interviews and 15 process maps.

Broadcasting and media
35,000 → 150,000

Units per week modelled as a scale-up path during operational due diligence for an acquisition.

Operational due diligence, M&A
+35% output

An operational transformation delivering more than 50,000 additional units in 12 months and a 22% increase in weekly gross profit.

Manufacturing

Your operation

Facing something similar?

A 30-minute conversation is usually enough to tell whether it's worth looking at together.